|
Why Have
We All Been Taught the Theory Of Evolution as Fact? |
| 86 |
Despite the fact that no
facts have ever been produced making the "Theory of Evolution"
the "Fact of Evolution", many people still blindly cling to it
since they do not believe in creation and feel it is the best and only
thing they have to go on. |
It is the best theory
because it is supported by a vast amount of evidence. There is no
scientific theory of creation. |
argument from ignorance |
| 87 |
Throughout the 1900's
there have been numerous trials regarding teaching of evolution,
creationism or both in the public schools. The Creationists have always
fought to have the Theory of Evolution taught as THEORY, not fact, since
it truly is only a theory to this day. |
ALL science is based on
theory. And the creationists have lost every times because they have no
theory to offer. |
argument from ignorance |
| 88 |
The evolutionists on the
other hand have always fought to have creationism NOT MENTIONED AT ALL
in the schools. |
Because there is no
scientific theory of creation. It is not an alternative. It cannot be
taught as science. Scientists have fought to prevent it being taught as
science. |
argument from ignorance |
| 89 |
They have always refused
to have creationism taught as an alternative to evolution. |
There is no scientific
theory of creation. It is not an alternative. |
argument from ignorance |
| 90 |
Since many people group
creationism into a religious category, and religion was not to be taught
in the public schools, evolution came out on top as what was to be
taught to children in the public schools. |
It is religion. There is
no scientific theory of creation. |
irrelevant |
| 91 |
The crime of the matter
is that it is that if it is taught in the schools without mention of
creation as a possible alternative, children assume it is fact. |
There is no scientific
theory of creation. It is not a 'possible alternative'. |
FALSE |
| 92 |
In addition, the theory
of evolution has been taught as fact in every other branch of knowledge
in the world, to the point where you may be laughed at or even refused
funding (in the case of scientists) if you do not believe in the theory. |
You'll be laughed at for
believing that you can overthrow the theoretical underpinning of the
sciences of biology and palaeontology with a few poorly understood
arguments, some of which have been thoroughly discredited well over 100
years ago. |
FALSE |
| 93 |
It's been over 150 years
since the theory of evolution was proposed and promoted throughout the
world, yet to this day we know no more about the origin of species then
we did then, |
What do you think that
palaeontologists and biologist have been doing in that case? We know
incomparably more about the origin of species now than we did 150 years
ago! The whole science of genetics has developed from nothing within the
past 150 years, and has made enormous contributions to our understanding
of evolution. |
Utter bollocks! |
| 94 |
and all of the proofs
mentioned above have been thrown out by evolutionists. |
What 'proofs' have you
offered? I have seen none. |
FALSE |
| 95 |
And despite all of the
facts against each evolutionist argument, the evolutionists continue to
grasp at straws and blindly accept a theory which is CLEARLY not fact.
|
A theory cannot be a
fact! A theory can be very, very well-supported by evidence. The
evidence that evolution has occurred is overwhelming. To believe that it
has not occurred would fly in the face of all the evidence. |
FALSE |
| 96 |
Many do this simply
because they refuse to believe the alternative (creation), |
There is no scientific
theory of creation. It is not an alternative. |
FALSE |
| 97 |
or because they fear to
be at odds with their colleagues. |
The only example of an
honest creationist I have heard of is Kurt Wise.
Read about him here:
Dawkins on Kurt Wise
For the rest, I know of no palaeontologist or biologist who sees
creation as a scientifically sound alternative to evolution. |
FALSE |
|
Here are some quotes
that show how evolutionists cling to the theory of evolution regardless
of proof against it. |
|
|
